This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1087057108323125v1 13/8/777    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wiles, A. M. Articles by Bishop, A. J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wiles, A. M. Articles by Bishop, A. J. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Analysis of Normalization Methods for Drosophila RNAi Genomic Screens and Development of a Robust Validation Scheme

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bishopa{at}uthscsa.edu.

	Abstract

Genome-wide RNA interference (RNAi) screening allows investigation of the role of individual genes in a process of choice. Most RNAi screens identify a large number of genes with a continuous gradient in the assessed phenotype. Screeners must decide whether to examine genes with the most robust phenotype or the full gradient of genes that cause an effect and how to identify candidate genes. The authors have used RNAi in Drosophila cells to examine viability in a 384-well plate format and compare 2 screens, untreated control and treatment. They compare multiple normalization methods, which take advantage of different features within the data, including quantile normalization, background subtraction, scaling, cellHTS2 (Boutros et al. 2006), and interquartile range measurement. Considering the false-positive potential that arises from RNAi technology, a robust validation method was designed for the purpose of gene selection for future investigations. In a retrospective analysis, the authors describe the use of validation data to evaluate each normalization method. Although no method worked ideally, a combination of 2 methods, background subtraction followed by quantile normalization and cellHTS2, at different thresholds, captures the most dependable and diverse candidate genes. Thresholds are suggested depending on whether a few candidate genes are desired or a more extensive systems-level analysis is sought. The normalization approaches and experimental design to perform validation experiments are likely to apply to those high-throughput screening systems attempting to identify genes for systems-level analysis. (Journal of Biomolecular Screening XXXX:xx-xx)

First published on August 27, 2008, doi:10.1177/1087057108323125

Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2008;13:777.

A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. D. Zhang and J. F. Heyse Determination of sample size in genome-scale RNAi screens Bioinformatics, April 1, 2009; 25(7): 841 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. D. Zhang, S. D. Marine, and M. Ferrer Error Rates and Powers in Genome-Scale RNAi Screens J Biomol Screen, March 1, 2009; 14(3): 230 - 238. [Abstract] [PDF]