Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register for free online access

Journal of Biomolecular Screening
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niedernberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kostenis, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niedernberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kostenis, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Comparative Analysis of Functional Assays for Characterization of Agonist Ligands at G Protein-Coupled Receptors

Anke Niedernberg

Cardiovascular Disease Group, Aventis Pharma, 65926 Frankfurt, Germany

Sorin Tunaru

Pharmakologisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 366, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

Andree Blaukat

Pharmakologisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 366, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

Bruce Harris

CNS Disease Group, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater NJ, 08807-0800

Evi Kostenis

Cardiovascular Disease Group, Aventis Pharma, 65926 Frankfurt, Germany, ek{at}7tm.com

A variety of functional assays are available for agonist or antagonist screening of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), but it is a priori not predictable which assay is the most suitable to identify agonists or antagonists of GPCRs with therapeutic value in humans. More specifically, it is not known how a given set of GPCR agonists compares in different functional assays with respect to potency and efficacy and whether the level of the signaling cascade that is analyzed has any impact on the detection of agonistic responses. To address this question, the authors used the recently cloned human S1P5 receptor as a model and compared a set of 3 lipid ligands (sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P], dihydro sphingosine 1-phosphate [dhS1P], and sphingosine) in 5 different functional assays: GTP{gamma}S binding, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity, mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ via the FLIPR and aequorin technology, and MAP kinase (ERK1/2) activation. S1P induced agonistic responses in all except the ERK1/2 assays with EC50 values varying by a factor of 10. Whereas dhS1P was identified as a partial agonist in the GTP{gamma}S assay, it behaved as a full agonist in all other settings. Sphingosine displayed partial agonistic activity exclusively in GTP{gamma}S binding assays. The findings suggest that assays in a given cellular background may vary significantly with respect to suitability for agonist finding and that ligands producing a response may not readily be detectable in all agonist assays. (Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2003:500-510)

Key Words: G protein-coupled receptor • G protein • sphingosine 1-phosphate • S1P5 receptor

Journal of Biomolecular Screening, Vol. 8, No. 5, 500-510 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1087057103257555


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
M. A. Gilchrist, A. Cacace, and D. G. Harden
Characterization of the 5-HT2b Receptor in Evaluation of Aequorin Detection of Calcium Mobilization for Miniaturized GPCR High-Throughput Screening
J Biomol Screen, July 1, 2008; 13(6): 486 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
K. J. Cassutt, M. J. Orsini, M. Abousleiman, D. Colone, and W. Tang
Identifying Nonselective Hits from a Homogeneous Calcium Assay Screen
J Biomol Screen, March 1, 2007; 12(2): 285 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
P. Gribbon, C. Chambers, K. Palo, J. Kupper, J. Mueller, and A. Sewing
A Novel Method for Analyzing [Ca2+] Flux Kinetics in High-Throughput Screening
J Biomol Screen, August 1, 2006; 11(5): 511 - 518.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. Fichna, K. Gach, M. Piestrzeniewicz, E. Burgeon, J. Poels, J. V. Broeck, and A. Janecka
Functional Characterization of Opioid Receptor Ligands by Aequorin Luminescence-Based Calcium Assay
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 1150 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
T. C. Kent, K. S. J. Thompson, and L. H. Naylor
Development of a Generic Dual-Reporter Gene Assay for Screening G-Protein-Coupled Receptors
J Biomol Screen, August 1, 2005; 10(5): 437 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]