|
|
Comparative Analysis of Functional Assays for Characterization of Agonist Ligands at G Protein-Coupled Receptors
Anke Niedernberg
Cardiovascular Disease Group, Aventis Pharma, 65926 Frankfurt, Germany
Sorin Tunaru
Pharmakologisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 366, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Andree Blaukat
Pharmakologisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 366, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Bruce Harris
CNS Disease Group, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater NJ, 08807-0800
Evi Kostenis
Cardiovascular Disease Group, Aventis Pharma, 65926 Frankfurt, Germany, ek{at}7tm.com
A variety of functional assays are available for agonist or antagonist screening of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), but it is a priori not predictable which assay is the most suitable to identify agonists or antagonists of GPCRs with therapeutic value in humans. More specifically, it is not known how a given set of GPCR agonists compares in different functional assays with respect to potency and efficacy and whether the level of the signaling cascade that is analyzed has any impact on the detection of agonistic responses. To address this question, the authors used the recently cloned human S1P5 receptor as a model and compared a set of 3 lipid ligands (sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P], dihydro sphingosine 1-phosphate [dhS1P], and sphingosine) in 5 different functional assays: GTP S binding, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity, mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ via the FLIPR and aequorin technology, and MAP kinase (ERK1/2) activation. S1P induced agonistic responses in all except the ERK1/2 assays with EC50 values varying by a factor of 10. Whereas dhS1P was identified as a partial agonist in the GTP S assay, it behaved as a full agonist in all other settings. Sphingosine displayed partial agonistic activity exclusively in GTP S binding assays. The findings suggest that assays in a given cellular background may vary significantly with respect to suitability for agonist finding and that ligands producing a response may not readily be detectable in all agonist assays. (Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2003:500-510)
Key Words: G protein-coupled receptor G protein sphingosine 1-phosphate S1P5 receptor
Journal of Biomolecular Screening, Vol. 8, No. 5,
500-510 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1087057103257555

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Gilchrist, A. Cacace, and D. G. Harden
Characterization of the 5-HT2b Receptor in Evaluation of Aequorin Detection of Calcium Mobilization for Miniaturized GPCR High-Throughput Screening
J Biomol Screen,
July 1, 2008;
13(6):
486 - 493.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Cassutt, M. J. Orsini, M. Abousleiman, D. Colone, and W. Tang
Identifying Nonselective Hits from a Homogeneous Calcium Assay Screen
J Biomol Screen,
March 1, 2007;
12(2):
285 - 287.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Gribbon, C. Chambers, K. Palo, J. Kupper, J. Mueller, and A. Sewing
A Novel Method for Analyzing [Ca2+] Flux Kinetics in High-Throughput Screening
J Biomol Screen,
August 1, 2006;
11(5):
511 - 518.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Fichna, K. Gach, M. Piestrzeniewicz, E. Burgeon, J. Poels, J. V. Broeck, and A. Janecka
Functional Characterization of Opioid Receptor Ligands by Aequorin Luminescence-Based Calcium Assay
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
June 1, 2006;
317(3):
1150 - 1154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. C. Kent, K. S. J. Thompson, and L. H. Naylor
Development of a Generic Dual-Reporter Gene Assay for Screening G-Protein-Coupled Receptors
J Biomol Screen,
August 1, 2005;
10(5):
437 - 446.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|