Journal of Biomolecular Screening

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turek-Etienne, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turek-Etienne, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, R. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Biomolecular Screening, Vol. 8, No. 2, 176-184 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1087057103252304

Evaluation of Fluorescent Compound Interference in 4 Fluorescence Polarization Assays: 2 Kinases, 1 Protease, and 1 Phosphatase

Tammy C. Turek-Etienne

New Lead Discovery, Schering-Plough Research Institute K15 4/4800 B421C, 2015 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033

Eliza C. Small

Sharon C. Soh

Tianpei A. Xin

Priti V. Gaitonde

Ellen B. Barrabee

Richard F. Hart

Robert W. Bryant

With the increasing use of fluorescence-based assays in high-throughput screening (HTS), the possibility of interference by fluorescent compounds needs to be considered. To investigate compound interference, a well-defined sample set of biologically active compounds, LOPACTM, was evaluated using 4 fluorescein-based fluorescence polarization (FP) assays. Two kinase assays, a protease assay, and a phosphatase assay were studied. Fluorescent compound interference and light scattering were observed in both mixture- and single-compound testing under certain circumstances. In the kinase assays, which used low levels (1-3 nM) of fluorophore, an increase in total fluorescence, an abnormal decrease in mP readings, and negative inhibition values were attributed to compound fluorescence. Light scattering was observed by an increase in total fluorescence and minimal reduction in mP, leading to false positives. The protease and phosphatase assays, which used a higher concentration of fluorophore (20-1200 nM) than the kinase assays, showed minimal interference from fluorescent compounds, demonstrating that an increase in the concentration of the fluorophore minimized potential fluorescent compound interference. The data also suggests that mixtures containing fluorescent compounds can result in either false negatives that can mask a potential "hit" or false positives, depending on the assay format. CyTM dyes (e.g., Cy3BTM and Cy5TM) excite and emit further into the red region than fluorescein and, when used in place of fluorescein in kinase 1, eliminate fluorescence interference and light scattering by LOPACTM compounds. This work demonstrates that fluorescent compound and light scattering interferences can be overcome by increasing the fluorophore concentration in an assay or by using longer wavelength dyes. (Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2003:176-184)

Key Words: fluorescence polarization • fluorescence interference • light scattering • CyTM dyes • kinase assay • protease assay • phosphatase assay


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
Yuhong Du, K. Moulick, A. Rodina, J. Aguirre, S. Felts, R. Dingledine, Haian Fu, and G. Chiosis
High-Throughput Screening Fluorescence Polarization Assay for Tumor-Specific Hsp90
J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2007; 12(7): 915 - 924.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
C. Antczak, D. Shum, S. Escobar, B. Bassit, E. Kim, V. E. Seshan, Nian Wu, Guangli Yang, O. Ouerfelli, Y.-M. Li, et al.
High-Throughput Identification of Inhibitors of Human Mitochondrial Peptide Deformylase
J Biomol Screen, June 1, 2007; 12(4): 521 - 535.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
A. K. Quercia, W. A. Lamarr, J. Myung, C. C. Ozbal, J. A. Landro, and K. J. Lumb
High-Throughput Screening by Mass Spectrometry: Comparison with the Scintillation Proximity Assay with a Focused-File Screen of AKT1/PKB{alpha}
J Biomol Screen, June 1, 2007; 12(4): 473 - 480.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
J. Moger, P. Gribbon, A. Sewing, and C. P. Winlove
The Application of Fluorescence Lifetime Readouts in High-Throughput Screening
J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2006; 11(7): 765 - 772.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
J. Kim, S. Felts, L. Llauger, H. He, H. Huezo, N. Rosen, and G. Chiosis
Development of a Fluorescence Polarization Assay for the Molecular Chaperone Hsp90
J Biomol Screen, August 1, 2004; 9(5): 375 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
A. Pommereau, E. Pap, and A. Kannt
Two Simple and Generic Antibody-Independent Kinase Assays: Comparison of a Bioluminescent and a Microfluidic Assay Format
J Biomol Screen, August 1, 2004; 9(5): 409 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
T. C. Turek-Etienne, M. Lei, J. S. Terracciano, E. F. Langsdorf, R. W. Bryant, R. F. Hart, and A. C. Horan
Use of Red-Shifted Dyes in a Fluorescence Polarization AKT Kinase Assay for Detection of Biological Activity in Natural Product Extracts
J Biomol Screen, February 1, 2004; 9(1): 52 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]