Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Biomolecular Screening
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feiglin, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Heppel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feiglin, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Heppel, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Implementing Multilevel Dynamic Scheduling for a Highly Flexible 5-Rail High Throughput Screening System

Marc N. Feiglin

Department of HTS and Automation, Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ

Stephen Skwish

Department of HTS and Automation, Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ

Michael Laab

CST Logic Softwareentwicklungs GmbH, Mainz-Kastel, Germany

Andreas Heppel

CST Logic Softwareentwicklungs GmbH, Mainz-Kastel, Germany

As automation solves the bottleneck involved in drug screening, new bottlenecks present themselves. Some of these bottlenecks include sample management, hit picking and confirmation, and reagents lost as a result of incomplete runs. To keep up with the demands of a large HTS department, scientists spend a disproportionate amount of time simply feeding these systems with samples and reagents. Automating the sample management functions directly on the screening systems would solve this problem. With the use of online data analysis, an integrated sample store permits automated hit picking and confirmation. In addition to these issues, other bottlenecks are often caused by instrument malfunctions. A single lost run can now mean a loss of hundreds of plates and the reagents associated with their testing. A system was designed to include four assaying systems that are fed by an automated online sample repository system. Redundancy between the assaying systems allows for an extra level of error handling in case of a malfunction. The control of such a system requires a sophisticated scheduler/controller software package capable of coordinating the interaction between multiple systems and reacting to changes in the robotic environment in realtime. This paper discusses the design of the system as well as the requirements and selection of an appropriate scheduler/controller package.

Journal of Biomolecular Screening, Vol. 5, No. 1, 39-47 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/108705710000500108


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?