This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1087057105285611v1 11/3/253    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Eastwood, B. J. Articles by Smith, G. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Eastwood, B. J. Articles by Smith, G. F. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Minimum Significant Ratio: A Statistical Parameter to Characterize the Reproducibility of Potency Estimates from Concentration-Response Assays and Estimation by Replicate-Experiment Studies

Statistics and Information Sciences, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; Eli Lilly and Company Lilly Corporate Center Indianapolis, IN 46285 bje{at}lilly.com

Mark W. Farmen

Philip W. Iversen

Statistics and Information Sciences, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Trelia J. Craft

Cardiovascular Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Jeffrey K. Smallwood

Kim E. Garbison

Neil W. Delapp

Lead Optimization Biology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Gerald F. Smith

Cardiovascular Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

The authors show by illustration that procedures used to validate the reliability of single-concentration high-throughput screens such as the signalwindowand Z' factor do not ensure sufficient reliability in potency estimates fromconcentration response assays. They develop theminimumsignificant ratio as a statistical parameter to characterize the fold change between 2 compounds run in the same experiment that can be considered a real difference and use this parameter to characterize the reliability of the assay. They adaptmethods described by Bland and Altman to develop a simple set of 2 experiments to estimate theminimum significant ratio and show that this protocol can identify assays that lack reproducibility. The methods are then extended to validate the equivalency of the same assay run by multiple laboratories.

Key Words: minimum significant ratio • replicate-experiment studies • potency reproducibility • statistical methods

This version was published on April 1, 2006

Journal of Biomolecular Screening, Vol. 11, No. 3, 253-261 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1087057105285611


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. MacArthur, W. Leister, H. Veith, P. Shinn, N. Southall, C. P. Austin, J. Inglese, and D. S. Auld Monitoring Compound Integrity With Cytochrome P450 Assays and qHTS J Biomol Screen, June 1, 2009; 14(5): 538 - 546. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. K.Y. Chan, B. A. Lutterbach, B.-S. Pan, I. Kariv, and A. A. Szewczak High-Throughput Analysis of HGF-Stimulated Cell Scattering J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2008; 13(9): 847 - 854. [Abstract] [PDF]

				X. D. Zhang Novel Analytic Criteria and Effective Plate Designs for Quality Control in Genome-Scale RNAi Screens J Biomol Screen, June 1, 2008; 13(5): 363 - 377. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Inglese, D. S. Auld, A. Jadhav, R. L. Johnson, A. Simeonov, A. Yasgar, W. Zheng, and C. P. Austin Quantitative high-throughput screening: A titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries PNAS, August 1, 2006; 103(31): 11473 - 11478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. W. Iversen, B. J. Eastwood, G. S. Sittampalam, and K. L. Cox A Comparison of Assay Performance Measures in Screening Assays: Signal Window, Z' Factor, and Assay Variability Ratio J Biomol Screen, April 1, 2006; 11(3): 247 - 252. [Abstract] [PDF]