This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1087057105281048v1 10/7/658    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bender, A. Articles by Glen, R. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bender, A. Articles by Glen, R. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Screening for Dihydrofolate Reductase Inhibitors Using MOLPRINT 2D, a Fast Fragment-Based Method Employing the Naïve Bayesian Classifier: Limitations of the Descriptor and the Importance of Balanced Chemistry in Training and Test Sets

Hamse Y. Mussa

Robert C. Glen

Unilever Centre for Molecular Science Informatics, Department of Chemistry, Lensfield Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United KingdomE-mail:rcg28{at}cam.ac.uk

A fragment-based similarity searching method, MOLPRINT 2D, was employed for virtual screening of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. Using the original training set of 50,000 compounds, only marginal enrichment factors (between 1 and 3) could be achieved on the test library. The active structures contained in the training and test libraries represented different types of "chemistry," that is, different substructural features associated with activity. Training and test sets were pooled in a 2nd step and randomly split into training and test of equal size, with the objective of smoothing out the different chemical characteristics of both libraries. In a 10-fold cross-validation study on the new training and test sets, typically 10-fold enrichment could be found in the first 96 positions, 4-fold enrichment in the first 384 positions, and 3-fold enrichment in the first 1536 positions, corresponding to 6, 10, and 28 hits, respectively (out of a total of 307; activity defined as average residual activity of less than 80%). The conclusions are 2-fold. On one hand, the exact fragment-matching similarity searching method employed here is not capable of finding completely novel hit structures. On the other hand, this study emphasizes the requirement for a comparable distribution of chemical features of the training and test sets. MOLPRINT 2D is freely downloadable from http://www.cheminformatics.org.

Key Words: virtual screening • molecular similarity • MOLPRINT • DHFR • dihydrofolate reductase

This version was published on October 1, 2005

Journal of Biomolecular Screening, Vol. 10, No. 7, 658-666 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1087057105281048


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. H. Elowe, J. E. Blanchard, J. D. Cechetto, and E. D. Brown Experimental Screening of Dihydrofolate Reductase Yields a "Test Set" of 50,000 Small Molecules for a Computational Data-Mining and Docking Competition J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2005; 10(7): 653 - 657. [Abstract] [PDF]