Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Biomolecular Screening
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1087057105281173v1
10/7/653    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elowe, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elowe, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, E. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Experimental Screening of Dihydrofolate Reductase Yields a "Test Set" of 50,000 Small Molecules for a Computational Data-Mining and Docking Competition

Nadine H. Elowe

Jan E. Blanchard

Jonathan D. Cechetto

Eric D. Brown

Department of Biochemistry & Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5E-mail:ebrown{at}mcmaster.ca

High-throughput screening (HTS) generates an abundance of data that are a valuable resource to be mined. Dockers and data miners can use "real-world" HTS data to test and further develop their tools. A screen of 50,000 diverse small molecules was carried out against Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and compared with a previous screen of 50,000 compounds against the same target. Identical assays and conditions were maintained for both studies. Prior to the completion of the second screen, the original screening data were publicly released for use as a "training set," and computational chemists and data analysts were challenged to predict the activity of compounds in this second "test set." Upon completion, the primary screen of the test set generated no potent inhibitors of DHFR activity.

Key Words: DHFR • high-throughput screening • data mining • chemical space • competition

This version was published on October 1, 2005

Journal of Biomolecular Screening, Vol. 10, No. 7, 653-657 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1087057105281173


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
V. Makarenkov, P. Zentilli, D. Kevorkov, A. Gagarin, N. Malo, and R. Nadon
An efficient method for the detection and elimination of systematic error in high-throughput screening
Bioinformatics, July 1, 2007; 23(13): 1648 - 1657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
P. T. Lang, I. D. Kuntz, G. M. Maggiora, and J. Bajorath
Evaluating the High-Throughput Screening Computations
J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2005; 10(7): 649 - 652.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
R. Brenk, J. J. Irwin, and B. K. Shoichet
Here Be Dragons: Docking and Screening in an Uncharted Region of Chemical Space
J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2005; 10(7): 667 - 674.
[Abstract] [PDF]