Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Biomolecular Screening
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, D.
Right arrow Articles by Josiah, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, D.
Right arrow Articles by Josiah, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Adopting a Practical Statistical Approach for Evaluating Assay Agreement in Drug Discovery

Dongyu Sun

Adrian Whitty

James Papadatos

Miki Newman

Jason Donnelly

Scott Bowes

Serene Josiah

Biogen Idec Inc., Cambridge, MA.

The authors assess the equivalence of 2 assays and put forward a general approach for assay agreement analysis that can be applied during drug discovery. Data sets generated by different assays are routinely compared to each other during the process of drug discovery. For a given target, the assays used for high-throughput screening and structure-activity relationship studies willmost likely differ in their assay reagents, assay conditions, and/or detection technology, whichmakes the interpretation of data between assays difficult, particularly as most assays are used to measure quantitative changes in compound potency against the target. To better quantify the relationship of data sets from different assays for the same target, the authors evaluated the agreement between results generated by 2 different assays that measure the activity of compounds against the same protein, ALK5. The authors showthat the agreement between data sets can be quantified using correlation and Bland-Altman plots, and the precision of the assays can be used to define the expectations of agreement between 2 assays. They propose a scheme for addressing issues of assay data equivalence, which can be applied to address questions of how data sets compare during the lead identification and lead optimization processes in which assays are frequently added and changed.

Key Words: assay comparison • correlation • agreement analysis • statistical analysis

Journal of Biomolecular Screening, Vol. 10, No. 5, 508-516 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1087057105275725


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
V. Unterreiner, Y. Ibig-Rehm, M. Simonen, H. Gubler, and D. Gabriel
Comparison of Variability and Sensitivity between Nuclear Translocation and Luciferase Reporter Gene Assays
J Biomol Screen, January 1, 2009; 14(1): 59 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
B. J. Eastwood, M. W. Farmen, P. W. Iversen, T. J. Craft, J. K. Smallwood, K. E. Garbison, N. W. Delapp, and G. F. Smith
The Minimum Significant Ratio: A Statistical Parameter to Characterize the Reproducibility of Potency Estimates from Concentration-Response Assays and Estimation by Replicate-Experiment Studies
J Biomol Screen, April 1, 2006; 11(3): 253 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]